All posts tagged social media

Stop putting numbers on it.

Last week, I was witness to a semantic discussion about the next wave of social media technologies and community. I have started seeing “Social Media 2.0″, “Web 3.0″, etc cropping up and I want to say something.

Stop it.

Please.

Because Social Media is NOT about computers. It is not a piece of software that someone can just buy a new version of and join. And it perpetuates a ridiculous misunderstanding that it is at all related to computers, platforms and tools.

It is not.

Social Media is a concept. It is a multidisciplinary revolution of technology, community, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, politics… and the list goes on.

It is a movement. It is hard to define. It transcends versions, and platforms, and technologies.

It is a concept in its own right, and by putting those ridiculous numbers after it, we are lumping it into IT. It needs to stop.

Please stop it. My clients are getting confused. Thank you.

In defence of Facebook lists (is Google+ really that great?)

I wouldn’t be me without being a little contrary, would I?

Two weeks ago, I had the pleasure of being one of the select few (million) people who were invited (read: had a friend who used the invite workaround) to Google’s new-fangled social media network, Google+.

I had a play. And have continued to play with it for the last few weeks. And, despite being initially impressed, joining the chorus of “DEATH TO FACEBOOK! AND TWITTER!”, I dunno. I am now a little bit “meh”.

Sure, the circles interface is pretty. And the Hangout feature is really, really impressive. And, the integration with my Google and Youtube accounts… handy. But, I am still using Facebook. And am no longer in that anti-Facebook chorus… and you know why?

Facebook has evolved. And, besides some UI improvements and the really excellent Hangout feature, Google+ does little that Facebook doesn’t already do. Most people just aren’t aware of it.

Now, I am not merely dissing Google+ for the fun of it. After all, I am an avid user of social media and am thrilled to see the innovations and “game changers” go at it… because ultimately it is better for all users to have them competing.

But… you know…

Meh.

As I say to all of my clients, social media is not about gadgets, or technology, or tools. It is about reaching people on their terms, and applying traditional communication & marketing techniques in a new space. They are just tools. And getting your average person to switch their whole communication over to a new platform… well… that’s tricky.

I hear you say “ohhhh but what about MySpace, huh? Facebook killed that when people were saying it wouldn’t!”

There’s a reason for that. MySpace sucked balls. Facebook added something new: minimalism and hyper-connectivity like never seen before. And Facebook evolved over time into what it is today. They removed graffiti walls (oh how I miss drawing penises on my friends walls), refined the UI gradually, added applications, and now has a unified inbox that I actually love, and use every day.

Facebook has had some pretty severe problems with regards to default user settings and privacy, but… I don’t think anyone can underestimate that Google has a fight on its hands if it is going to get the 750 million (!) or so people to move over.

On “Circles” (and why it is not all that innovative really)

One feature that got everyone in a tizzy was “Circles”. The ability to add people to circles and follow people, filter feeds etc based on groups. Well, you may not be aware, but Facebook already does this. Facebook lists are very powerful, and I have been using them for some time. You can opt to share status updates with networks, friends of friends, and “Everyone”. You can filter your chat to only appear online to certain groups.

Let me show you.

Facebook has the ability to create lists, so you can control who sees what, who has access to you on chat, who can message you, add you, stalk you, see photos… in fact, the granular Facebook settings are tremendously powerful.

See? Go into your Friends list and you can create a list. You can put people into said lists, and then control the features. For example, I set it so that clients cannot contact me after hours on Facebook chat. Similarly, so that family cannot contact me during work hours. And… other settings depending on what sort of chat mood I am in.

I also have a default setting that allows any underaged or… more… wowsery people on my friend lists, not see my statuses by default. Which is good for the ol’ drunk Facebooking! But also has powerful utility. You may notice that I have lists that are for different “voices”. Professional me, Candid me, Anything goes me, a list for those that truly “get” what I am about (for the weirder bits!), family… it’s all there and easy to control.

Like I have said a hundred times… switching tools will not necessarily “fix” your problems if you aren’t using the tools correctly. Whether Google+ gains ground beyond the geek crowd remains to be seen, but we shouldn’t overestimate the innovation that has occurred either.

Facebook already supplies these sorts of features. These are just tools. And there are already mumblings about concerns about Google+ privacy… whether you do have true control over your content (for example having your statuses shared), and a plethora of other teething problems that Facebook are slowly ironing out over time.

I will continue to use both, but whether Google+ is truly innovative, or just another Google attempt at showing geeks shiny things, remains to be seen.

 

Commonwealth Women Parliamentarians Conference

I will be presenting at the Women Parliamentarians Conference in Sydney this week on online campaigning and the management of social media. Something that is not unique to politicians, but typical, is that they need to balance it with the 1001 other commitments of a public figure. My presentation will talk about some of these issues, and make some suggestions on ways to improve your online presence. It’s about working smarter, not harder with social media. And also, importantly, retaining some privacy and leisure space on the web.

It applies to so many other industries as well – where the social media evangelists have been singing the praises for so long… and yes, we are all convinced, but it all comes unstuck when you are busy, need training, or don’t use your website. There will also be some talk on making yourself *too* available (which often has detrimental effects in other areas of your life).

It is my first “proper” Conference speaking gig – hopefully the first of many! I am humbled by the fact that I ave been asked to speak alongside people like Lisa Baker, Jenny Lindell and Laurel Papworth. With such a high calibre audience of people who speak for a living… I am nervous but honoured and hopefully can provide people with some practical tips to manage their online presence in a more efficient, targeted and beneficial way.

I am also planning on having some meetings in Sydney for some very exciting projects I am working on and I hope to tell you about them very soon :)

We use twitter because… wait… what exactly is it again?

Yesterday I had the great privilege of attending the Media140 Conference here in Perth. It was a great event for many reasons – to match real people to usernames, or to ‘network’ – but also, from a web designer’s point of view, it was good to try and gauge the general mood about social media in various organisations.

In early 2007, I was talking up Twitter, Facebook and Flickr before I had even really embraced them myself. I had a Twitter account myself, of course, but it was pretty inactive, and I distinctly remember telling @lisaloeb4real about this new “group SMS” type feature. I thought that, knowing Lisa, she would love the ability to just SMS from the airport, or backstage, or whilst eating the world’s greatest donut. So there she was, tweeting away, and in fact, I think she was one of the very early “celebrity” adopters of these new social media tools.

I attended a Conference in late 2008, and after seeing it’s true potential, I was hooked. I finally understood (sort of) what a hashtag is. What it meant to “RT”. And it appears, that, to date, at least 80 million people, including a bunch of fairly inane celebrities, enjoy it too.

But, after attending the Media140 Conference yesterday, I have a feeling that there has been a whole industry of people who, despite selling “social media consulting” somewhere in their services, are still in the idea of talking up social media and it’s potential without fully embracing it – or even using it appropriately.

I had the opportunity to meet quite a few people who work in various aspects of Health care. Some get it and some don’t. It was actually very interesting what came out of these discussions, because the common theme at the Conference was the idea of how “the BRAND” is affected, how companies can “CONTROL” negative information on the internet, and I daren’t count how many times the words “engage”, “citizen journalist”, “social media policy” and other buzzwords cropped up from the speakers. There was so much talk about top-down internet communities that it actually made me wonder if people really understood the power of social media at all.

The precise point is that you cannot control negative messaging. But what social media does is provide you with the tools to try and intervene at the word-of-mouth level and make it better. This, without buzzwords, is what is so great about Twitter.

But a big part of Twitter is not so much the bottom line stuff… because that can have mixed results… and by continually focusing on mere dollars and cents, you miss the entire point.

Twitter is more than just dollars per tweet.

Twitter in particular has intangible benefits in so many other ways that make “branding” and “bottom line” seem, honestly, so trivial that hearing those words from “experts” made me feel a little nauseous.

We heard from the HR Rep telling us about how they are policing and monitoring the social media activities (and by implication, disciplining) their staff online. NOT about how they create communities, or improve morale, or that they add a third dimension to the inevitable death of the faceless corporation that hide behind PR & Lawyers. Instead, it was about risks, and controls, and potential client losses.

People are afraid of Twitter when they needn’t be. And in all honesty? I think way too much emphasis is placed this arbitrary line between employee/business owner and human being. And instead of corporations speaking in really great buzzwords, like “humanising your corporation” – how about the idea of the generic “consumer” finally having a face. And a VOICE.

The conduit for community

I had a chat to a couple of people who, after hearing all of the speakers, still weren’t entirely sure on how Twitter, or Facebook, or social networking in general, applied to their organisation. For those who are in service delivery organisations like Mental Health and Community Services, the temptation is to make Twitter a means of broadcasting out to the “80 million people on Twitter”.

I’ll tell you now, that there are not 80 million people on Twitter. There is a potential audience of 80 million, sure. But people tout this figure off like it is some big huge deal when you know what? It means NOTHING to most businesses. Especially seeing as there is so much bad advice about using Twitter in the first place – the chances of people reading your message by accident, is, frankly, overstated.

I read an article in 2008, in reference to the music industry, about how all you need to make a decent living, is 1000 True Fans (and arguably, no crippling record label contract ;)), but this applies, figuratively, in so many ways to other businesses as well.

The strength of Twitter is in the building of micro communities. The Perth Twitter community is a good example of people who have found each other, through various means, over time, and a community has been built that is not just an audience, but a support network.

For me, during the day, Twitter is my chatterbox with other people who work in Home Offices. For others, it is a stress release from their day jobs. For others, it is just having a laugh, sharing a joke. I am also part of a few other networks, but to simplify, I know that at any time of day, someone in my community will be around to talk to.

This is the power of “Twitter for business”. We don’t talk about business much and when it does come up, it is understated and fairly innocuous (much like a social occasion where people ask what you do and leave it at that… you don’t launch into an Amway sales pitch on first meeting….do you…?)

When people can find a community, they can also find a support network, a counsellor, a group of people who understand. This has massive implications for service delivery, or health organisations that are on the ball, to start having discussions with your clients. Build a community of people who have a shared experience and let that community organically grow.

How about a discussion for parents of children with cancer or other chronic illness? How about a support group for those who battle Bipolar disorder or Schizophrenia? How about asking your clients what they want from you? Despite buzzwords like “engagement”, it is more than just talking one on one with your clients, customers, etc. It’s about allowing a community to build organically alongside your traditional means. In the health industry, these support networks can quite literally be a lifesaver, for people who may feel isolated.

Twitter is as much about shared experience as it is about access to information.

Stop talking and start LISTENING

Noone wants to be talked at. If you’re anything like me, you have emails, tweets, Facebook messages, radio ads, billboards, TV, internet banner ads and limitless numbers of people trying to sell you limitless amounts of stuff you don’t want or need. I for one am saturated. I am immune to corporate messaging. Most people are. But if you stop, and listen to what your clients actually want, you’ll be surprised that all they are trying to tell you is that they want to connect, in a meaningful way, not with a 2 dimensional CORPORATION, but with 3 dimensional people. People who understand. People who are flawed. People who might accidentally drunktweet and make bad mistakes sometimes. People who make them laugh one time and can have a deep & meaningful conversation another. All social media is… is people trying to connect.

If you can filter out the wanky PR buzzwords, and the talking up of social media from the “experts”, and the “OMG JOURNALISM IS DEAD AND I MUST FIND ANOTHER WAY TO SHOVE MY PRESS RELEASES DOWN PEOPLES THROATS”, and start actively listening, reflecting on what you are hearing, and embracing the incredible humanity and compassion that you see on Twitter every day, you have a small chance of being ahead of the curve. The “Corporation”, as we know it, is dying a slow, painful death. They’re fighting it by trying to control social media, control their employees (or the employees of other companies they work with), but, it’s a futile battle.

And try to write in Haiku. They’re fun.